Compromise: Knowing When It’s Wisdom and When It’s Surrender
- Tanuja Khanduja
- Aug 10
- 2 min read
Compromise is one of the most misunderstood skills in professional life. We often confuse it with “being nice,” “avoiding conflict,” or “keeping the peace.” But here’s the truth: not all compromises are noble. Some protect harmony without harming principles; others quietly eat away at discipline, trust, and respect. The ability to tell the difference isn’t just a leadership skill; it’s a survival skill in today’s workplace.
I learned this distinction the hard way, early in my career. I worked in Bank of Baroda in the Loans and Advances Department.
In my branch, there was a staff member who was… let’s say, creatively committed to his job.
He’d stroll in late, work for maybe an hour, and then vanish, all on his timetable. His work? Subpar at best. Any manager who tried to correct him was met with loud, aggressive, and downright disrespectful outbursts.
The problem? He had powerful union backing.
So, over time, managers stopped confronting him.
His behaviour was quietly tolerated, just to keep the peace & decorum in the office. Eventually, discipline across the office began to crumble. If anyone was questioned for being late or shirking duties, they’d simply point to him and say, “Correct him first.”
That was a bad compromise. We lowered our standards to avoid conflict, and the result was a slow, silent erosion of the work culture.
Now, contrast that with another incident.
We had a cash credit account in the branch with serious irregularities. I documented them and requested corrections.
A staff member, (who patronized that account for personal interests) tried to persuade me to drop the matter. When I refused, he went to the Zonal Office and accused me of bribery.
Fortunately, my reputation — built over the years — spoke for itself. My boss dismissed the claim outright. The account was later corrected.
That was me holding my ground where values were non-negotiable.
And yet, there have been times when flexibility was the right move.
For instance, if a deadline genuinely needed to be shifted for valid reasons, I’d readily adjust.
That wasn’t weakness, it was wisdom.
Here’s the thing: Not all compromises are created equal.
Compromising on principles? That’s surrender.
Compromising on methods or timelines? That’s collaboration.
Psychology backs this up. When you give in on preferences, the brain rewards you with trust-building chemistry like oxytocin. But when you give in on principles, you create cognitive dissonance, that inner unease when your actions betray your values.
So here’s my simple filter:
Compromise on methods, not morals.
Compromise on timelines, not truth.
Compromise on preferences, not principles.


The wisdom lies in knowing which is which.
Hold your values tightly, your opinions lightly, and your ego loosely.
Comments